Trump and Election USA: Why 2024 Won't Derail Mexico's Nearshoring Boom

Oct 31, 2024

Trump and Election USA: Why 2024 Won't Derail Mexico's Nearshoring Boom

In this blog, we’ll explore why the United States is no longer a prime manufacturing destination and why it relies on strong alliances, particularly with countries like Mexico.

Introduction

As the 2024 election USA approaches, concerns abound regarding the potential impact of a Trump-led administration on global manufacturing and nearshoring. While Trump’s previous tenure played a pivotal role in igniting Mexico’s nearshoring boom, current economic trends suggest that regardless of the election outcome, the U.S. is no longer a manufacturing powerhouse. This article explores why the combination of Trump rhetoric and election USA dynamics is unlikely to slow Mexico’s rapid growth in nearshoring, and it provides insights for businesses preparing for evolving trade landscapes.

Why Trump and Election USA Won’t Derail Nearshoring Growth

Despite the heated debates around the upcoming election USA, several factors indicate that Mexico’s nearshoring boom remains strong:

Historical Impact: In 2016, Trump’s unconventional policies inadvertently spurred companies to shift production closer to end markets. Today, his potential comeback—even with tariff threats—won’t reverse the structural decline in U.S. manufacturing.
Economic Realities: High labor costs, an aging workforce, and a shift towards service-based industries have all contributed to the U.S. losing its edge as a manufacturing hub.
Mutual Tariff Limitations: Under trade agreements like the USMCA, drastic tariff increases (such as the proposed 50% hikes often mentioned by Trump) are nearly impossible to implement without triggering retaliatory measures from key partners like Mexico and Canada.

Trump’s Role in Shaping Nearshoring Trends

Trump’s previous policies demonstrated that aggressive tariff rhetoric could accelerate nearshoring by prompting companies to reexamine their global supply chains. Today, while election USA discussions remain contentious, the underlying trend is clear:

Shift Away from Domestic Manufacturing: The U.S. has long faced challenges such as uncompetitive wages and a declining labor force. These issues have pushed companies to seek cost-effective alternatives in countries like Mexico.
Historical Precedent: Looking back at Trump’s initial impact, his influence contributed to a significant movement of manufacturing operations closer to American consumers, laying the groundwork for today’s nearshoring strategies.

The Decline of U.S. Manufacturing and Its Implications

Several structural issues continue to shape the U.S. economic landscape:

1. Falling Manufacturing Employment

Manufacturing jobs in the U.S. have declined steadily over the past 40 years. Even at its peak in 1979, the industry began a relentless slide due to automation, offshoring, and shifting consumer demands.

2. Future Outlook: Automation and Job Losses (H3)

Between 2021 and 2031, automation and technology will likely lead to further declines. Many production roles are set to vanish, reinforcing the trend that the U.S. is moving away from traditional manufacturing.

3. Aging Workforce and Slowed Labor Growth

With a rising median age and declining population growth, the U.S. labor force is shrinking. In contrast, Mexico’s youthful demographic provides a competitive edge for companies looking to invest in nearshoring operations.

Policy Implications and Trade Relations Post-Election

The political landscape, especially with Trump and election USA as key focal points, presents complex policy implications:

Trade Negotiations: A Trump administration might seek renegotiations of trade deals or push for stricter import policies. However, such moves are tempered by the need to maintain balanced economic relationships, particularly under frameworks like the USMCA.
Diplomatic Engagement: Any significant tariff adjustments would require discussions with Mexico and Canada, ensuring that economic stability is maintained. This diplomatic balancing act underlines why drastic measures are unlikely, despite aggressive rhetoric.
Business Confidence: Investors and multinational corporations monitor these policy shifts closely. The continuity of robust FDI from U.S. companies in Mexico demonstrates that, in practice, businesses are more focused on long-term supply chain resilience than short-term political promises.

Business Adaptation Strategies in the Trump Era

In light of these dynamics, businesses can adopt several strategies to navigate the uncertainties of a politically charged environment:

Diversification of Supply Chains: Companies are increasingly diversifying their supply chains to reduce dependency on any single country, ensuring continuity even if policy shifts occur.
Investment in Technology: As automation reshapes manufacturing, investments in technology and digital infrastructure can help firms remain competitive.
Enhanced Risk Management: Developing comprehensive risk management strategies, including scenario planning for political disruptions, enables businesses to respond quickly to policy changes.
Leveraging Geographic Proximity: For many U.S. companies, Mexico’s proximity offers a logistical advantage. Shorter transit times and reduced transportation costs continue to make nearshoring an attractive option, even amid political debates.

Foreign Direct Investment: A Testament to Resilience

Recent data confirms that American companies continue to invest heavily in Mexico. In 2Q24, U.S. firms contributed significantly to Mexico’s foreign direct investment (FDI), proving that the election USA—no matter the outcome—has not deterred economic partnerships. Major investments made in 2022 and 2023 highlight that the business community is committed to leveraging Mexico’s cost efficiencies and proximity to the U.S. market. This resilience in FDI further solidifies Mexico’s position as a preferred nearshoring destination despite the uncertainties surrounding Trump and election USA.

Conclusion: The Lasting Impact of Trump and Election USA

While the rhetoric surrounding Trump and election USA may stir debate, the fundamental economic forces at play signal a long-term shift away from U.S. manufacturing. Mexico’s nearshoring boom is set to continue as companies prioritize cost efficiency, rapid supply chains, and a youthful workforce over uncertain political promises. Moreover, businesses are adapting to these changes through diversification, technological investment, and strategic risk management. Ultimately, the structural challenges within the U.S. economy, combined with proactive business strategies, ensure that nearshoring remains a robust and attractive strategy for global companies.

Source: